26th February 2026
Blog
3 minute read

In our recent VM0047 Performance Benchmarking webinar, where we convened Verra, American Forest Foundation, and MSCI Carbon, one question came up more than any other: How do I choose the right Stocking Index?
Stocking Index (SI) selection shapes data stability, Performance Benchmarks, and VVB confidence. Getting it right ensures the data is working for you, not against you.
Here's what you should know when selecting a Stocking Index for VM0047 projects.
SI Options: Vegetation Indices, Canopy Height, and AGB
A Core Trade-Off: Early Detection vs. Long-Term Accuracy
Vegetation indices may detect early-stage change in young plantations. But as forests mature, they become unreliable.
Canopy height is better than greenness metrics but is still not a direct measure of biomass.
AGB is more stable long-term but may be less sensitive in year one or two.
The right choice depends on project stage, forest type, and what you're willing to defend to an auditor.
Baseline Accuracy Matters
A noisy index produces volatile baselines. Volatile and saturation-effect-prone baselines can mean fewer credits in the long term.
AGB-based indices produce more stable baselines because they're less affected by seasonality and saturation. Stable baselines mean more defensible credits.
Missed the webinar? Watch the recording here.
Have questions about SI selection for your project? Get in touch.